August 12, 2010 Lesson 11 of Numbers 16:1-35

There is evidence here of a double revolt: one by Korah (a Levite) ‘and all is company’ against Moses and Aaron; and one by Dathan and Abiram (Reubenites) against Moses. What was the ground of complaint in each case? See 16:3 and 16:13-14. To what extent was it justified? Cf. Heb 5:4; 2Cor 10:18. Answer: I am not sure that I see it as a “double revolt.” I see it as both things together pushed them over the edge. They (those speaking out against Moses here) saw Egypt as a land flowing with milk and honey compared to where they are now. In addition they saw Moses’ behavior as one of superiority. They obviously did not understand Moses. [Before I read Heb. 5:4 and 2 Cor 10:18 let me try this one on for size. As Christians we are to look at one another and help one another stay on track with the Word. In that regard we are to sometimes question things that are not in line with the Word and God. This is a bit different in that these men were obviously sinning against the Lord. Now for the other passages. ] The passages show that man does not choose, but it is God who chooses.


What lay behind the revolts that made them serious enough to warrant so drastic a punishment and warning to the people? See especially verses 11, 19, 28, 30. Answer: it was an outright direct sin against the Lord. These men were trying to disrupt and redirect the Israelites away from the will of God.


Note. Verse 1. That such men should lead an open revolt against the authority of Moses and Aaron meant that it was a very serious outbreak of discontent.